Volume outpaces capacity
Contact volumes grow faster than the team. Queues lengthen and service levels are missed at peak times.
AI FOR SERVICE
Service leaders are asked to lower cost and raise satisfaction at the same time. We help you decide which contacts AI should resolve and which need a person. Then we build the agents, assistants and integrations, and show that the change is working.
The problem
Demand keeps rising. Adding headcount is rarely an option, and customers notice when quality slips.
Contact volumes grow faster than the team. Queues lengthen and service levels are missed at peak times.
Routine requests take the same route as complex ones. Skilled advisers spend their day on work that needs no judgement.
Answers live in documents, inboxes and the heads of experienced staff. Customers get different answers from different people.
Leaders worry about wrong answers, tone and compliance. Without clear guardrails, pilots stay small.
Blueprint
A shared picture for service, technology and risk leaders. It makes scope and accountability clear before we build.
05
Where customers and advisers meet the AI.
04
The agents and assistants that take on defined service work.
03
The rules that keep answers accurate and safe.
02
One governed view of the customer and their history.
01
The sources the AI reads from and writes to.
Use cases
We rank candidates by contact volume, risk and readiness of knowledge, then build the strongest first. These six come up most often.
An AI agent classifies each new case, sets priority and routes it to the right queue. Team leads review the routing rules and any exceptions.
An agent resolves routine requests from approved knowledge and account data. It hands over to an adviser when the request falls outside policy.
An AI assistant works beside the adviser. Through a custom MCP server it can look up a case and update it under permission rules, with the adviser confirming each change.
An agent drafts articles from resolved cases. A knowledge owner reviews and publishes each one.
An agent prepares a short summary of the case so far when it is escalated. The receiving adviser starts informed and decides the next step.
An agent spots known issues affecting a customer and drafts a notice before they call. A service manager approves the message and the audience.
Workflow
One example of how a routine request is resolved, with a person in control of the exception.
A customer reports a faulty product in chat.
The order, warranty and case history are confirmed.
Diagnoses the fault and proposes a replacement within policy.
Approves the exception that sits outside standard policy.
Replacement is confirmed and the case is closed.
Illustrative views
Sample screens with sample values. They show the kind of evidence a service leader should expect each week.
Service AI performance
Sample quarter
Cases resolved by AI agent
46%
Average time to resolution
4.2 hrs
Customer satisfaction
4.5 / 5
Escalations to advisers
18%
Cases resolved without adviser effort
Self-service resolution
Web chat
My heating controller stopped responding this morning. It is only a few months old.
Sorry about that. I can see the order and it is under warranty. I have run the remote check and the unit is not responding, so a replacement is the right step.
Thank you. Could it be sent to my work address? I am away from home this week.
Approved after an identity check. The replacement will go to the work address and you will get tracking details by email.
Both views are illustrative. Values are samples, not client results.
Outcomes
Cost and quality are measured together. We agree the baselines with you first and report against them openly.
Targets are set with each client against their own baseline.
The share of contacts resolved by AI without adviser effort.
How long a customer waits from first contact to a resolved case.
The proportion of cases closed in a single interaction.
How customers rate the service they receive, across AI and adviser contacts.
The average cost of handling a contact across all channels.
How long it takes to move from decision to a governed AI agent handling real cases.
Approach
We advise and we build. Strategy and the business case come first. Design, build, launch and measurement follow.
01
We analyse contact reasons, knowledge quality and channel mix to find where AI can safely take on work.
Outputs
02
We prioritise use cases by volume and risk, and set out the business case with cost and quality measures side by side.
Outputs
03
We design and build the agents and assistants, the escalation paths and the limits on what AI may resolve alone.
Outputs
04
We launch in stages with your service teams, monitor answer quality and measure value against the business case.
Outputs
Start with a conversation. We will tell you plainly whether there is a case.